Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 17 - Aug 22
1239 (11th Cir
3) The ALJ’s reasons for not crediting the lay evidence from Mrs
3) The residual functional capacity finding is the product of a lay evaluation and is not supported by substantial evidence
Briefs for purchase: Appellant’s Initial Brief and Appellant’s Reply Brief
Although its conclusion regarding Dr
Helen K. v. Kijakazi (C.D. Ca. Jan. 24, 2023) - cognitive impairment, failure to include credited opinion, lay evidence 1239 (11th CirHelen K. v. Kijakazi, Case No. 2: 21 cv 09711 KES (C. D. Ca. Jan. 24, 2023) (Decision by U. S. Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Joint Stipulation and Memorandum Opinion and Order Topics addressed: Specific impairments stroke Specific impairments cognitive limitations RFC failure to include credited opinions Medical opinions (new law) persuasiveness RFC relationship with PRTF findings RFC need for special supervision
US$ 675.00
US$ 1625.00
US$ 24.99
US$ 1175.00
US$ 22.40
US$ 1499.50
US$ 1499.50
US$ 1075.00
US$ 699.50
US$ 1125.00
US$ 795.00
US$ 200.00
US$ 129.50
US$ 62.99
US$ 386.50
US$ 1195.00
