Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 22 - Aug 27
2021) (Decision by Circuit Judges Lagoa
the court found such objective evidence was present in this case
whether counsel’s “success is attributable to [counsel’s] own work or instead to some unearned advantage”
Remand for award of benefits – delay
The court concluded that the ALJ “did not articulate adequate reasons for discounting this evidence
S.R. v. O’Malley (D.N.J. July 31, 2024) - RFC - assistive device, past work, right to cross-examine VE 2021) (Decision by Circuit Judges. R. v. OMalley, Case No. 1: 23 cv 03004 KMW (D. N. J. July 31, 2024) (Decision by U. S. District Judge Karen M. Williams) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Reply Brief and remand order Topics addressed: RFC lack of support for findings RFC assistive device RFC manipulative limitations RFC need to consider severe and non severe impairments Past relevant work lack of support for RFC assessment Vocational testimony right to examine
